🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and revealed recent overtures had originated from mediators to resume negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a position of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

Trump recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He said the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always sought to enforce their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the final solution to address conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the identical tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the face of this assault."