🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.